curiousmind®️ · C-Lab · AI 场景连续洞察AI Scene Intelligence
AI 场景连续洞察合伙人AI Scene Intelligence Partner
面向一级市场 / 战投 / 创新决策者的 AI 赛道周度判断简报Weekly AI sector judgment briefs for VC GPs, strategic investors, and enterprise innovation leaders
Weekly Briefs
周度判断简报Weekly Judgment Briefs
每周一发布,判断周与信号周交替推送。简要报告对所有访客开放,完整报告单期购买。Published every Monday, alternating Judgment and Signal weeks. Brief reports open to all visitors; full reports available per issue.
AI 赛道竞争主轴已从"能力"切换到"效率"——需求端企业付费逻辑(D1)、供给端按需缩放(S1)、技术端稀疏状态架构(T1)在同一周形成结构性确认;开源商业模式的根本矛盾同步暴露:技术质量无法自动转化为企业采购意愿,开源模型变现路径已从"终端替代"收缩为"生态基础设施变现"。AI competition has shifted from "capability" to "efficiency" — enterprise purchasing logic (D1), on-demand scaling (S1), and sparse state architecture (T1) structurally confirm this in a single week; open-source business model contradictions are simultaneously exposed: technical quality does not automatically translate into enterprise procurement intent, and the monetization path has contracted from "endpoint replacement" to "ecosystem infrastructure monetization."
AI 赛道竞争主轴已从"能力"切换到"效率"——需求端企业付费逻辑(D1)、供给端按需缩放(S1)、技术端稀疏状态架构(T1)在同一周形成结构性确认;开源商业模式的根本矛盾同步暴露:技术质量无法自动转化为企业采购意愿,开源模型变现路径已从"终端替代"收缩为"生态基础设施变现"。AI competition has shifted from "capability" to "efficiency" — enterprise purchasing logic (D1), on-demand scaling (S1), and sparse state architecture (T1) structurally confirm this in a single week; open-source business model contradictions are simultaneously exposed: technical quality does not automatically translate into enterprise procurement intent, and the monetization path has contracted from "endpoint replacement" to "ecosystem infrastructure monetization."
关键结论Key Conclusions
1. 企业 AI 采购逻辑完成一次关键分层:可问责性优先于成本绝对值,已被行为数据证实1. Enterprise AI Procurement Logic Has Stratified: Accountability Over Absolute Cost, Confirmed by Behavioral Data
Menlo Ventures 对 600+ 企业的调查显示,企业将 89% 的 $700 万 AI 预算集中于有 SLA/厂商背书的闭源模型;开源模型企业直接采购份额从 19% 降至 11%,方向性逆转而非正常波动(来源:Menlo Ventures,2026 State of Gen AI)。A Menlo Ventures survey of 600+ enterprises shows 89% of $7M AI budgets go to SLA-backed closed-source models; open-source direct procurement fell from 19% to 11%, a directional reversal, not normal fluctuation (Source: Menlo Ventures, 2026 State of Gen AI).
2. 开源模型商业化路径已结构性分裂,生态基础设施变现是唯一可规模化路径2. Open-Source Commercialization Has Structurally Split: Ecosystem Infrastructure Monetization Is the Only Scalable Path
DeepSeek V4 技术能力达到历史新高(256K 上下文、原生 Agent 架构、MIT 许可证),同期企业直接采购开源模型比例持续下滑。缺失的不是技术质量,而是"可问责性封装"。评估开源 AI 公司商业价值的正确指标不是"企业直接采购份额",而是"谁在其权重上构建了有付费客户的可问责服务"。DeepSeek V4 achieves historic technical capability highs (256K context, native Agent architecture, MIT license), while enterprise direct procurement keeps declining. What's missing is not technical quality, but "accountability packaging." The correct metric for evaluating open-source AI companies is not "enterprise direct procurement share," but "who has built accountable services with paying customers on top of its weights."
3. AI 效率优化完成三层渗透,"单位智能成本"进入持续下降通道3. AI Efficiency Optimization Achieves Three-Layer Penetration: "Cost Per Unit of Intelligence" Enters Sustained Decline
训练(Prime Intellect 去中心化训练,成本降 30–50%)、推理(GPT-5.6 Terra 达 Sol 95% 性能但成本降 60%)、架构(Meta SDM 线性 RNN,内存效率提升 10 倍、推理速度提升 3 倍)三层同步出现。竞争逻辑从"谁的模型最强"转向"谁在同等智能下成本最低、可问责性最强"。Training (Prime Intellect decentralized training, -30~50% cost), inference (GPT-5.6 Terra reaches 95% of Sol performance at 60% cost reduction), and architecture (Meta SDM linear RNN, 10× memory efficiency, 3× inference speed) all synchronized. Competition logic shifts from "whose model is strongest" to "who delivers the lowest cost with strongest accountability at equivalent intelligence."
4. Agent 中间件市场压缩速度超出市场预期,收窗信号已在两条独立路线上同步出现4. Agent Middleware Market Compression Faster Than Expected: Closing-Window Signals Appear Simultaneously on Two Independent Paths
GPT-5.6 原生多模态 Agent 编排与 DeepSeek V4 原生 Agent 架构在同一周完成,两条独立路线同步内化"模型即 Agent"范式。LangChain/AutoGen 类中间件的差异化护城河已不再是"编排能力",而必须依赖行业数据壁垒或企业级合规集成深度。GPT-5.6 native multimodal Agent orchestration and DeepSeek V4 native Agent architecture were completed in the same week — two independent paths simultaneously internalizing "model-as-Agent." Differentiation moats for LangChain/AutoGen-type middleware can no longer rely on "orchestration capability"; they must depend on industry data barriers or enterprise compliance integration depth.
5. "后 Nvidia 生态"三角形成,属中期配置逻辑而非近期交易信号5. "Post-Nvidia Ecosystem" Triangle Formed — Mid-Term Positioning Logic, Not Near-Term Trading Signal
SambaNova(硬件替代,生产就绪)+ Prime Intellect(软件优化,商业早期)+ Meta SDM(架构变革,研究阶段)构成三维验证三角。Nvidia CUDA 生态锁定在接下来 36 个月内首次面临多维联合侵蚀——这是中期配置逻辑,不是近期颠覆信号。SambaNova (hardware alternative, production-ready) + Prime Intellect (software optimization, early commercial) + Meta SDM (architectural change, research stage) form a three-dimensional validation triangle. Nvidia's CUDA ecosystem lock-in faces its first multi-dimensional joint erosion within the next 36 months — this is a mid-term positioning thesis, not a near-term disruption signal.
🔒
行动建议 · 风险提示Action Recommendations · Risk Warnings
欲深度了解行动建议及完整风险提示,请获取完整报告To access action recommendations and full risk analysis, please purchase the complete report
本页启示:Page Insight:第 30 周将第 29 周"拐点方向已确认"推进至"拐点之后竞争维度已定型"——效率竞争是下一阶段主战场,可问责性是企业采购的核心过滤器。这两个判断将在未来数期持续作为分析基础框架。Week 30 advances Week 29's "inflection direction confirmed" to "post-inflection competition dimensions defined" — efficiency competition is the next battleground, accountability is the core filter for enterprise procurement. These two judgments will serve as the analytical framework foundation for the coming issues.
AI 场景连续洞察合伙人 · 第 30 周 · 2026/07/17AI Scene Intelligence Partner · Week 30 · 2026/07/17 本报告仅供指定收件人参考,未经授权不得转发或引用。For designated recipients only. Unauthorized forwarding or citation is prohibited.
三条独立证据线同周收敛(BCG ROI 量化 / Gartner 替代规模量化 / EdgeBench 能力速度量化),构成商业化拐点的多维交叉验证;P1 × P2 政策镜像同日出现,全球 AI 治理从「争议期」进入「双向武器化期」。Three independent evidence lines converge in the same week (BCG ROI quantification / Gartner substitution scale / EdgeBench capability speed) forming a multi-dimensional cross-validation of a commercial inflection point; P1 × P2 policy mirror appears on the same day — global AI governance shifts from "dispute period" to "bilateral weaponization period."
Agentic AI 正式进入「经济规模效应验证阶段」——BCG ROI 量化、Gartner 替代规模量化、EdgeBench 能力速度量化三条独立证据线同周收敛,构成商业化拐点的多维交叉验证;P1 × P2 政策镜像同日出现,全球 AI 治理从「争议期」进入「双向武器化期」。Agentic AI officially enters the "economic scale effect validation stage" — BCG ROI quantification, Gartner substitution scale quantification, and EdgeBench capability speed quantification converge in the same week, forming multi-dimensional cross-validation of a commercial inflection point; P1 × P2 policy mirror appears on the same day, global AI governance shifts from "dispute period" to "bilateral weaponization period."
关键结论Key Conclusions
1
三线收敛验证商业化拐点方向,置信度高Three-line convergence validates commercial inflection direction — high confidence BCG 量化 AI 投入回报(token 投入 top quintile 企业收入增长 16.5% vs 5.1%)、Gartner 量化替代规模($234B 企业 SaaS 支出面临 Agentic AI 转移风险)、EdgeBench 量化能力速度(Agent 学习速度每 3 个月翻倍)三条独立来源在同一周方向收敛。商业化拐点的到来方向是高置信度的,时间线仍有 ±2 个季度不确定性。BCG quantifies AI ROI (top quintile token spenders: 16.5% vs 5.1% revenue growth), Gartner quantifies substitution scale ($234B enterprise SaaS spend at Agentic AI transfer risk), EdgeBench quantifies capability speed (Agent learning speed doubles every 3 months) — three independent sources converging in the same week. The direction of the commercial inflection point is high-confidence; timing still has ±2 quarters uncertainty.
2
P1 × P2 政策镜像:前沿 AI 战略资产属性获两大主权力量同步确认P1 × P2 Policy Mirror: frontier AI strategic asset status simultaneously confirmed by two sovereign powers 2026/07/08,美国批准 GPT-5.6 全面发布,中国商务部同日磋商前沿 AI 模型出口限制(与半导体/稀土同等保护框架)。两国采取相反工具,却确认相同认知:**前沿 AI 已是值得国家级保护/规制的战略资产**。跨美中边界的 AI 基础设施评估,从本周起必须引入「政策隔离风险」维度。2026/07/08: US approves GPT-5.6 full release; China's MOFCOM simultaneously deliberates frontier AI model export restrictions (equivalent framework to semiconductors/rare earths). Two countries use opposite tools but confirm the same recognition: frontier AI is a strategic asset worthy of national-level protection/regulation. Any cross-US-China AI infrastructure assessment must now incorporate "policy isolation risk" as a dimension.
3
企业 Agentic AI 从「可采购区(进入)」升级为「可采购区(巩固)」Enterprise Agentic AI upgrades from "Procurable Zone (entry)" to "Procurable Zone (consolidation)" BCG 数据使需求侧从「相信有收益」升级为「已有第三方数据支撑」;GPT-5.6 政府-行业协作发布机制为交付可问责性加固监管层。两轴同步提升,置信度高。BCG data upgrades demand side from "believe there are returns" to "third-party data supported"; GPT-5.6 government-industry collaborative release mechanism reinforces regulatory layer on delivery accountability. Both axes improve simultaneously — high confidence.
4
SaaS 替代风险获量化,$234B 从定性叙事升级为可操作的投资评估基准SaaS substitution risk quantified — $234B upgrades from qualitative narrative to actionable investment benchmark Gartner $234B 使 SaaS 颠覆论从「概念预测」转化为「有数字基础的风险评估」。即使实际替代幅度只有 50%,$117B 的量级足以重构 SaaS 行业格局。持有传统 SaaS 仓位的 GP,这是需要重新评估持仓结构的信号。Gartner's $234B converts the SaaS disruption thesis from "conceptual prediction" to "risk assessment with numerical basis." Even at 50% actual substitution, $117B is sufficient to restructure the SaaS sector. For GPs holding traditional SaaS positions, this is a signal to reassess portfolio structure.
5
Cursor CFO Council:token 成本治理从工程问题升级为 CFO 层财务治理问题Cursor CFO Council: token cost governance escalates from engineering to CFO-level financial governance Cursor CFO Council(Asana、SentinelOne CFO 加入,8 月首轮会议定于建立 token 成本治理框架)的成立,标志着 AI 采购决策审批链从 CTO 延伸至 CFO 的机构化起点。ROI 已量化的场景成本顾虑降为次要;ROI 尚未量化的场景成本顾虑仍是主要瓶颈。Formation of Cursor CFO Council (Asana, SentinelOne CFOs joining; inaugural August meeting to establish token cost governance framework) marks the institutionalized starting point of AI procurement approval chain extending from CTO to CFO. In validated-ROI scenarios, cost concerns become secondary; in unvalidated-ROI scenarios, cost concerns remain the primary bottleneck.
🔒
行动建议 · 风险提示Action Recommendations · Risk Warnings
欲深度了解行动建议及完整风险提示,请获取完整报告To access action recommendations and full risk analysis, please purchase the complete report
本页启示:Page Insight:第 29 周是 C-Lab 连续三周判断积累的确认节点——第 27 周建立假设,第 28 周记录基础设施三重分化,第 29 周三条独立证据线收敛确认拐点方向。Agentic AI 的商业化问题已从「是否发生」转为「多快、在哪里、谁受益」。Week 29 is the confirmation node of three consecutive weeks of C-Lab judgment accumulation — Week 27 established hypotheses, Week 28 recorded triple infrastructure divergence, Week 29 sees three independent evidence lines converge to confirm the inflection direction. The Agentic AI commercialization question has shifted from "whether it happens" to "how fast, where, and who benefits."
Agentic AI 基础设施层正在三向分化——服务化(AWS FDE)、算力分发(Together AI Neocloud)、国产算力(LongCat-2.0)。上周确立的"成本可问责性是规模化瓶颈"判断需要修正:业界的应对不是降低成本,而是用服务化包裹成本。Agentic AI infrastructure is splitting three ways — servicization (AWS FDE), compute distribution (Together AI Neocloud), and domestic compute (LongCat-2.0). Last week's judgment that "cost accountability is the bottleneck for scaled deployment" needs revision: the industry response is not to lower costs, but to wrap costs inside services.
Agentic AI 基础设施层正在三向分化——服务化(AWS FDE)、算力分发(Together AI Neocloud)、国产算力(LongCat-2.0)。上周确立的"成本可问责性是规模化瓶颈"判断需要修正:业界的应对不是降低成本,而是用服务化包裹成本。Agentic AI infrastructure is splitting three ways — servicization (AWS FDE), compute distribution (Together AI Neocloud), and domestic compute (LongCat-2.0). Last week's judgment that "cost accountability is the bottleneck for scaled deployment" needs revision: the industry response is not to lower costs, but to wrap costs inside services.
关键结论Key Conclusions
1. AWS $10 亿 FDE:成本可问责性问题的服务侧解法已经出现1. AWS $1B FDE: Service-Side Solution to Cost Accountability Has Arrived
AWS $10 亿 Forward Deployed Engineering 组织的出现,表明业界主流应对是"用人力服务把成本变量转化为合同固定值",而非修复消费计制本身(来源:SiliconANGLE,2026/06/30)。FDE 工程师嵌入企业内部,客户看到的是项目合同金额,不是 token 消费额度。The emergence of AWS's $1B Forward Deployed Engineering organization signals the industry's mainstream response: convert cost variables into fixed contract values through human services, rather than fixing the consumption model itself (Source: SiliconANGLE, 2026/06/30). FDE engineers embed within the enterprise; customers see a project contract amount, not token consumption quotas.
2. Together AI $83 亿:Neocloud 是 AI 时代的 CDN2. Together AI $8.3B: Neocloud Is the CDN of the AI Era
Together AI 完成 $8 亿 C 轮,估值 $83 亿,年度 Booking 突破 $11.5 亿,16 个月内估值 2.5×(来源:TechCrunch,2026/07/01)。Aramco Ventures 领投 + Nvidia 跟投的组合释放双重信号:主权能源资本认为 AI 算力基础设施是国家战略资产,AI 芯片制造商在押注自己的下游分发渠道。Together AI closed an $800M Series C at an $8.3B valuation, with annual bookings surpassing $1.15B and a 2.5× valuation increase in 16 months (Source: TechCrunch, 2026/07/01). The Aramco Ventures lead + Nvidia follow-on combination sends a dual signal: sovereign energy capital views AI compute infrastructure as a national strategic asset, and AI chipmakers are betting on their own downstream distribution channels.
3. LongCat-2.0:非 NVIDIA 算力路径假设需要分裂追踪3. LongCat-2.0: Non-NVIDIA Compute Path Must Be Split for Independent Tracking
美团发布 LongCat-2.0——1.6T 参数 MoE 模型,完全在 5 万张华为 Ascend 910 国产 ASIC 上训练,MIT 开源(来源:FelloAI,2026/06/30)。非 NVIDIA 算力路径需分裂为两条独立路径:西方路径(Cerebras/Trainium,推理加速层)与中国国产路径(Ascend 910,已达到前沿规模训练能力)。Meituan released LongCat-2.0 — a 1.6T parameter MoE model trained entirely on 50,000 Huawei Ascend 910 domestic ASICs, open-sourced under MIT license (Source: FelloAI, 2026/06/30). The non-NVIDIA compute path must now be split into two independent tracks: the Western track (Cerebras/Trainium, inference acceleration) and the China domestic track (Ascend 910, which has achieved frontier-scale training capability).
4. 美国 AI 立法进入"Agent 专项"阶段,政策精度提升4. US AI Legislation Enters "Agent-Specific" Phase, Policy Precision Increases
Warner AI AGENT Act 草案(7/1)聚焦 AI Agent 隐私保护、守门人反垄断、可治理性三个维度(来源:CompleteAITraining,2026/07/01)。联合上周 GAAIA 讨论稿,美国联邦 AI 立法在两周内完成了"覆盖→深化"的跳跃。The Warner AI AGENT Act draft (7/1) focuses on three dimensions: AI Agent privacy protection, gatekeeper antitrust, and governability (Source: CompleteAITraining, 2026/07/01). Combined with last week's GAAIA discussion draft, US federal AI legislation completed a "coverage → depth" leap within two weeks.
5. AI 基础设施叙事正在主权化5. AI Infrastructure Narrative Is Being Sovereignized
本周三条信号(AWS FDE 服务层、Together AI Neocloud 算力层、LongCat-2.0 训练层)+ 上周 Dream 主权 AI($30 亿)+ Odyssey 物理 AI($1.45B),五周内持续的信号密度表明:AI 基础设施正在从 VC 叙事升级为主权资本叙事。This week's three signals (AWS FDE service layer, Together AI Neocloud compute layer, LongCat-2.0 training layer) + last week's Dream sovereign AI ($3B) + Odyssey physical AI ($1.45B) — five weeks of sustained signal density indicate: AI infrastructure is upgrading from a VC narrative to a sovereign capital narrative.
🔒
行动建议 · 风险提示Action Recommendations · Risk Warnings
欲深度了解行动建议及完整风险提示,请获取完整报告To access action recommendations and full risk analysis, please purchase the complete report
本页启示:Page Insight:上周核心判断是"成本可问责性是 Agentic 规模化的新瓶颈"。本周发现这个瓶颈的主流解法不是消除成本,而是用服务化使成本不可见。判断框架的迭代方向:从"成本障碍"转向"服务化速度"。Last week's core judgment was "cost accountability is the new bottleneck for Agentic scale-up." This week reveals the mainstream solution is not to eliminate costs, but to make them invisible through servicization. Framework evolution direction: from "cost barrier" to "servicization speed."
AI 场景连续洞察合伙人 · 第 28 周 · 2026/07/03AI Scene Intelligence Partner · Week 28 · 2026/07/03 本报告仅供指定收件人参考,未经授权不得转发或引用。For designated recipients only. Unauthorized forwarding or citation is prohibited.
Agentic AI 从"推迟叙事"切换至"兑现叙事"——ROI 已普遍验证,但消费计制将成本可问责性变为规模化部署的新门槛。Agentic AI shifts from "deferred narrative" to "delivery narrative" — ROI is widely validated, but consumption-based pricing makes cost accountability the new barrier to scaled deployment.
AI 场景连续洞察合伙人 — 第 27 周 简要报告 · 2026/06/20 · 信号周 🟡AI Scene Intelligence Partner — Week 27 Brief · 2026/06/20 · Signal Week 🟡
核心判断Core Judgment
Agentic AI 从"推迟叙事"切换至"兑现叙事"——ROI 已普遍验证,但消费计制将成本可问责性变为规模化部署的新门槛。Agentic AI shifts from "deferred narrative" to "delivery narrative" — ROI is widely validated, but consumption-based pricing makes cost accountability the new barrier to scaled deployment.
关键结论Key Conclusions
1. Agentic AI ROI 兑现已跨越统计显著性门槛1. Agentic AI ROI Delivery Has Crossed the Statistical Significance Threshold
96% 的已部署 Agentic AI 企业报告 ROI 达到或超出预期(其中 42% 超出),72% 企业员工满意度上升。核心问题已从"是否值得试"切换为"如何快速规模化,成本谁来管"。96% of enterprises with deployed Agentic AI report ROI meeting or exceeding expectations (42% exceeding), and employee satisfaction rose at 72% of companies. The core question has shifted from "Is it worth trying?" to "How do we scale quickly, and who manages the costs?"
2. 消费计制制造"信心缺口"2. Consumption Pricing Creates a "Confidence Gap"
Microsoft Copilot Cowork GA 全面切换消费计制,AI 交互成本自 2023 年以来跳涨 30 倍——从 $0.04 升至 $1.20 / 次交互。ROI 已验证(96%)与成本不可预测(30×)形成直接张力:CFO 层面的采购阻力将在 ROI 兑现之后、而非之前出现。Microsoft Copilot Cowork GA fully switched to consumption-based pricing, with AI interaction costs jumping 30× since 2023 — from $0.04 to $1.20 per interaction. The tension between validated ROI (96%) and unpredictable costs (30×) is direct: CFO-level procurement resistance will emerge after ROI is proven, not before.
3. 开源 vs 闭源定价模式进入结构性分裂3. Open-Source vs. Closed-Source Pricing Models Enter Structural Divergence
Mistral 以 Apache 2.0 开源 675B MoE 模型 + $14.99 / 月 Pro 层参战。闭源走消费计制(成本随 Agent 复杂度放大),开源走订阅 + 自托管(成本上限可控)。企业供应商选择将越来越由成本结构而非能力差异驱动。Mistral entered the market with an open-source 675B MoE model under Apache 2.0 + a $14.99/month Pro tier. Closed-source follows consumption pricing (costs scale with Agent complexity); open-source follows subscription + self-hosting (cost ceiling is controllable). Enterprise vendor selection will increasingly be driven by cost structure rather than capability differences.
4. 合规 AI 赛道进入采购加速窗口4. Compliance AI Sector Enters Procurement Acceleration Window
EU AI Act 综合修正案 423:57 票终审通过,2026/12/02 与 2027/12/02 两个截止日期写入法律文本,"不再有进一步推迟的政治空间"。弹性合规采购正转为刚性采购,6 个月内将出现可观察到的采购加速。The EU AI Act omnibus amendment passed its final vote 423:57, with December 2, 2026 and December 2, 2027 deadlines written into legal text — "no further political space for delays." Flexible compliance procurement is converting to mandatory procurement; observable procurement acceleration will emerge within 6 months.
5. 主权 AI 与物理 AI 作为独立赛道获资本验证5. Sovereign AI and Physical AI Validated as Independent Sectors by Capital
Dream 主权 AI 平台($30 亿估值)+ Odyssey 世界模型($1.45B 估值)单周合计超 $5.7 亿融资。两个赛道各自独立,不依赖通用 Agentic AI 叙事——赛道分层信号已出现。Dream sovereign AI platform ($3B valuation) + Odyssey world model ($1.45B valuation) raised a combined $570M+ in a single week. Both tracks are independent, not reliant on the general Agentic AI narrative — sector stratification signals have emerged.
🔒
行动建议 · 风险提示Action Recommendations · Risk Warnings
欲深度了解行动建议及完整风险提示,请获取完整报告To access action recommendations and full risk analysis, please purchase the complete report
本页启示:Page Insight:ROI 兑现不等于采购意愿落实,中间隔着成本可问责性。Agentic AI 已跨越技术可行门槛,正在面对经济可行门槛的真实考验。Validated ROI does not equal realized procurement intent — cost accountability sits in between. Agentic AI has crossed the technical feasibility threshold and is now facing the real test of economic feasibility.
AI 场景连续洞察合伙人 · 第 27 周 · 2026/06/20AI Scene Intelligence Partner · Week 27 · 2026/06/20 本报告仅供指定收件人参考,未经授权不得转发或引用。For designated recipients only. Unauthorized forwarding or citation is prohibited.
Pricing
获取完整报告Get Full Report
单期购买,无需订阅,按需获取。Per-issue purchase, no subscription required.
HKD 999 / 份 / issue
单期购买,按需获取,无需订阅Per-issue, on-demand, no subscription
Airwallex 支付页面支持 支付宝 / 微信支付 / Visa / Mastercard 等多种方式,扫码或输入卡号即可完成支付。Airwallex checkout supports Alipay / WeChat Pay / Visa / Mastercard and more. Scan QR or enter card details to complete payment.
支付完成后,请返回本页填写邮箱并点击下方「确认已支付」。完整报告链接将发送至您的邮箱,通常在 1 小时内送达。After payment, return here, enter your email and click "I've Paid." The full report link will be sent to your inbox, usually within 1 hour.